a fistful of bloggers

by Lee Hopkins on August 21, 2005

in Uncategorized

G'day! Thanks for returning!

a fistful of travellers chequesDave Taylor re-introduces a popular topic into the blogosphere – where do you draw the line on ‘cash for comments’?’

Just as one can be paid for commenting favourably, whether one discloses that or not, so too can one be drawn into an ethical debate for having, let’s say, Google Adsense ads on your blog page. Or be in receipt of free books that you review and post about. Or a nice new gadget/toy.

As Dave says:

But even there, the book title in my blog entry is linked to Amazon via an Amazon Associates link: should I disclose that I’d make $0.17 for each copy someone bought after clicking through my link? And how different is that than pointing out that if the reader clicked on one of the associated Google ads, I’d make $0.09? At what level do we not need to disclose commercial relationships?

Equally of interest to Dave’s own thoughts are the comments from other communicators, like Amy Gahran (who’s helping Heidi Miller be an even more successful Shameless Self Promoter):

I’d say that it might work well for some bloggers to accept money to influence their choice of topic, without necessarily influencing the content. The key to making that work would be transparency, of course. People want to know what they’re getting.

This might especially make sense with book, music, DVD, and game reviews, come to think of it.

It would be an interesting experiment. Sure it would ruffle some feathers — but that’s what feathers are for, right? ;-)

If ethical guidelines were so tight as to permit no ‘cash-or-equivalent for comments’ then should I stop blogging because Ben Hamilton gave me free hosting? But Ben’s answer to my email asking “do you want me to blog about you in return?’ was instructive of the ‘new morality’ of the blogosphere:

ta, but honest comments, good, bad, indifferent. no BS to your readers.

Perhaps a blogospherical morality is already extant and, as Don Bell says,

I do not have a problem with a respected blogger getting paid for something they are passionate about, and I don’t mind if I don’t know if they get paid.

Money, money, money, must be funny, in a rich man's world...

  • Lee
    "Expect inevitable criticism" - that's the killer for me. I always find it a touch sad when something niche (like the web was at first, like blogging was at first - a small community of like minded souls) becomes popular and a part of the masses.

    Egoism becomes rampant, flame wars start, context is discarded, vitriol is an unfortunate but beomes an accepted part of life.

    Of course, that's life; but I must have a bit of old hippy in my soul somewhere because I detest conflict (and I'll beat the living daylights out of anyone who disagrees).

    But back to the topic: Yes, the 'cash for questions or comment' issue will never go away, because each person's ethical boundaries are not only different to others', but also different to themselves, dependent upon context. What is okay for me to shun this week might not be okay to shun next, and so on, because of different circumstances or context.

    Oh, and love your work with Heidi Miller, Amy...
  • Yes, I agree, I think transparency is the key issue here. A blogger is free to make whatever policy she/he wants regarding payment for coverage (or no policy), and then be held accountable accordingly.

    And of course, the audience is free to think whatever it wants about a given blogger's approach. One thing's for sure: Any blogger who makes and publishes such a policy will offend someone, somewhere -- and they'll complain about it, loudly. It's impossible to please everyone, especially online. So bloggers should do as their conscience dictates, expect inevitable criticism, and roll with it.

    IMHO, of course.

    - Amy Gahran
    Editor, Contentious
  • Lee, I believe the debate over there is a bit self-righteous: can I be pure if my blog is a revenue source?

    Sure. GoogleAdsense, for example. I would never believe a blogger is biased because of Google Ads. Ditto for Amazon Associates.

    For payola or gifts directly related to a post, it's more complicated but still not an issue for me:

    1) a book or software sample? Mention it in the post.

    2) anything bigger? €25 or more? Can't be justified. No thanks.

    Talking about or mentioning a client or one of its main competitors? Say so. Ditto with important suppliers.

    And finally: You can't buy my good words, and you can't pay me to shut up.

    For me, that sums it up without being complicated. Anything more edges into navel-gazing hand-wringing (just picture that and you'll laugh).
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: