<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media For Business 101 &#8211; free white paper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/</link>
	<description>innovative communication for innovative communicators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:39:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fusinessfinancialaccounting.info &#187; Christian Science Monitor, Dobbs cited misleading Zogby poll to report that Americans support House version of immigration bill</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-1445</link>
		<dc:creator>fusinessfinancialaccounting.info &#187; Christian Science Monitor, Dobbs cited misleading Zogby poll to report that Americans support House version of immigration bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/#comment-1445</guid>
		<description>[...] Young (Trafcom News 42) 12:30 Bryan Person comments on Trafcom News 42 and 43 14:46 I recommend the social media white paper by Lee Hopkins and Trevor Cook and Bryan Person?s New Comm Road podcast, particularly the episodes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Young (Trafcom News 42) 12:30 Bryan Person comments on Trafcom News 42 and 43 14:46 I recommend the social media white paper by Lee Hopkins and Trevor Cook and Bryan Person?s New Comm Road podcast, particularly the episodes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Hopkins: Better Communication Results - business communication, online, blog and podcast consultant</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-1444</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Hopkins: Better Communication Results - business communication, online, blog and podcast consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/#comment-1444</guid>
		<description>[...] Since I had the good fortune to be in Sydney for a client presentation recently, I caught up with Trevor Cook, a fellow PR blogger and co-author of our exceptionally popular White Paper. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Since I had the good fortune to be in Sydney for a client presentation recently, I caught up with Trevor Cook, a fellow PR blogger and co-author of our exceptionally popular White Paper. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Hopkins: Better Communication Results - business communication, online, blog and podcast consultant</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-1443</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Hopkins: Better Communication Results - business communication, online, blog and podcast consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 16:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/#comment-1443</guid>
		<description>[...] You will remember, of course, that recently Trevor and I released a widely-praised White Paper on Social Media &#8212; &#8220;Social Media, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Communication&#8221;. Well, one of the areas that Trevor and I didn&#8217;t focus too much attention on was wikis, for very sound reasons: most Australian businesses are barely coping with the word &#8216;blog&#8217;; throw in &#8216;wiki&#8217; and you are going to be able to count the eyes glazing over in your audience. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You will remember, of course, that recently Trevor and I released a widely-praised White Paper on Social Media &#8212; &#8220;Social Media, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Communication&#8221;. Well, one of the areas that Trevor and I didn&#8217;t focus too much attention on was wikis, for very sound reasons: most Australian businesses are barely coping with the word &#8216;blog&#8217;; throw in &#8216;wiki&#8217; and you are going to be able to count the eyes glazing over in your audience. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Planet Nelson &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Not All Conversations Are Markets</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator>Planet Nelson &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Not All Conversations Are Markets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 22:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/#comment-1442</guid>
		<description>[...] Web 2point2 is being hosted by Chris Heuer&#8217;s Social Media Club. I went to a recent SMC event at SAS last month titled &#8220;From Social Media to Corporate Media.&#8221; It comprised largely of PR people discussing strategies for convincing their corporate overlords about the &#8220;how to learn to stop worrying and love communication&#8221; (see Cook &amp; Hopkins&#8216; Intro to Social Media). It was an interesting afternoon run in a series of &#8220;World Cafe&#8221; round-robin discussions that allowed everyone to talk. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web 2point2 is being hosted by Chris Heuer&#8217;s Social Media Club. I went to a recent SMC event at SAS last month titled &#8220;From Social Media to Corporate Media.&#8221; It comprised largely of PR people discussing strategies for convincing their corporate overlords about the &#8220;how to learn to stop worrying and love communication&#8221; (see Cook &#38; Hopkins&#8216; Intro to Social Media). It was an interesting afternoon run in a series of &#8220;World Cafe&#8221; round-robin discussions that allowed everyone to talk. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-1441</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 01:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/#comment-1441</guid>
		<description>Hi Libby,
Thanks for the compliment about feeling comfortable enough to ask me.

I agree with you that &#039;selling&#039; Second Life, even &#039;wikis&#039; is tough at the moment. For most organisations (and individuals) a blog is a big step (as you know).

However, as a communicator (anyone who has a business has perforce to be a good communicator, otherwise you go out of business very quickly) you need to be aware of this new collaborative technology, even if it does feel strange. After all, it was only a few short years ago that businesses were saying that the world wide web was a waste of time and no one would use it...

But I also totally agree with you that the avatar issue in Second Life is a block to business takeup. I have long held that a &#039;Second Business Life&#039; needs to be developed, without silly avatars and names, before the bulk of businesses will take it seriously.

Wikis are one of those things that on the one hand are incredibly useful collaborative tools, on the the other a bit difficult to learn how to use properly; a bit like when we first sat down with Word or WordPerfect and tried to get something to look half reasonable.

The reason Trevor and I focused on blogs and podcasts is because those two are the collaborative tools most useful / easily-understandable to the majority of businesses at the moment. Once they try out wikis, get the hang of them and get their heads around them, wikis will too become staples of business technology. But like you, I feel it will be a little while yet...

Many thanks for your great comment so far -- I am sure that you would not be surprised to learn that you are not alone in your thoughts and that a great many share your skepticism and doubts.

Kindests, Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Libby,<br />
Thanks for the compliment about feeling comfortable enough to ask me.</p>
<p>I agree with you that &#8216;selling&#8217; Second Life, even &#8216;wikis&#8217; is tough at the moment. For most organisations (and individuals) a blog is a big step (as you know).</p>
<p>However, as a communicator (anyone who has a business has perforce to be a good communicator, otherwise you go out of business very quickly) you need to be aware of this new collaborative technology, even if it does feel strange. After all, it was only a few short years ago that businesses were saying that the world wide web was a waste of time and no one would use it&#8230;</p>
<p>But I also totally agree with you that the avatar issue in Second Life is a block to business takeup. I have long held that a &#8216;Second Business Life&#8217; needs to be developed, without silly avatars and names, before the bulk of businesses will take it seriously.</p>
<p>Wikis are one of those things that on the one hand are incredibly useful collaborative tools, on the the other a bit difficult to learn how to use properly; a bit like when we first sat down with Word or WordPerfect and tried to get something to look half reasonable.</p>
<p>The reason Trevor and I focused on blogs and podcasts is because those two are the collaborative tools most useful / easily-understandable to the majority of businesses at the moment. Once they try out wikis, get the hang of them and get their heads around them, wikis will too become staples of business technology. But like you, I feel it will be a little while yet&#8230;</p>
<p>Many thanks for your great comment so far &#8212; I am sure that you would not be surprised to learn that you are not alone in your thoughts and that a great many share your skepticism and doubts.</p>
<p>Kindests, Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-5585</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/#comment-5585</guid>
		<description>Hi Libby,
Thanks for the compliment about feeling comfortable enough to ask me.

I agree with you that &#039;selling&#039; Second Life, even &#039;wikis&#039; is tough at the moment. For most organisations (and individuals) a blog is a big step (as you know).

However, as a communicator (anyone who has a business has perforce to be a good communicator, otherwise you go out of business very quickly) you need to be aware of this new collaborative technology, even if it does feel strange. After all, it was only a few short years ago that businesses were saying that the world wide web was a waste of time and no one would use it...

But I also totally agree with you that the avatar issue in Second Life is a block to business takeup. I have long held that a &#039;Second Business Life&#039; needs to be developed, without silly avatars and names, before the bulk of businesses will take it seriously.

Wikis are one of those things that on the one hand are incredibly useful collaborative tools, on the the other a bit difficult to learn how to use properly; a bit like when we first sat down with Word or WordPerfect and tried to get something to look half reasonable.

The reason Trevor and I focused on blogs and podcasts is because those two are the collaborative tools most useful / easily-understandable to the majority of businesses at the moment. Once they try out wikis, get the hang of them and get their heads around them, wikis will too become staples of business technology. But like you, I feel it will be a little while yet...

Many thanks for your great comment so far -- I am sure that you would not be surprised to learn that you are not alone in your thoughts and that a great many share your skepticism and doubts.

Kindests, Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Libby,<br />
Thanks for the compliment about feeling comfortable enough to ask me.</p>
<p>I agree with you that &#8216;selling&#8217; Second Life, even &#8216;wikis&#8217; is tough at the moment. For most organisations (and individuals) a blog is a big step (as you know).</p>
<p>However, as a communicator (anyone who has a business has perforce to be a good communicator, otherwise you go out of business very quickly) you need to be aware of this new collaborative technology, even if it does feel strange. After all, it was only a few short years ago that businesses were saying that the world wide web was a waste of time and no one would use it&#8230;</p>
<p>But I also totally agree with you that the avatar issue in Second Life is a block to business takeup. I have long held that a &#8216;Second Business Life&#8217; needs to be developed, without silly avatars and names, before the bulk of businesses will take it seriously.</p>
<p>Wikis are one of those things that on the one hand are incredibly useful collaborative tools, on the the other a bit difficult to learn how to use properly; a bit like when we first sat down with Word or WordPerfect and tried to get something to look half reasonable.</p>
<p>The reason Trevor and I focused on blogs and podcasts is because those two are the collaborative tools most useful / easily-understandable to the majority of businesses at the moment. Once they try out wikis, get the hang of them and get their heads around them, wikis will too become staples of business technology. But like you, I feel it will be a little while yet&#8230;</p>
<p>Many thanks for your great comment so far &#8212; I am sure that you would not be surprised to learn that you are not alone in your thoughts and that a great many share your skepticism and doubts.</p>
<p>Kindests, Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libby Ranzetta</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-1440</link>
		<dc:creator>Libby Ranzetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 23:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/#comment-1440</guid>
		<description>Hello Lee, I love what you do on this blog, on FIR and on your Cafe podcast.  But all this social media stuff is a bit scarey to me - I am a small business owner, not a PR/marketing person.  Blogging and podcasting I get.

However, tonight I signed up for Second Life and visited the Cafe and Crayonville.  (Why aren&#039;t you a Crayon, by the way?)  It was a lonely, soulless experience.  Now I have got to p11 of your white paper, and you are  raving about wikis, which I have also struggled to get much joy out of.  No doubt you will talk about Second Life later on in the paper.

Of all the new media podcasters/bloggers I feel I know Lee, it&#039;s only you I dare ask: is it OK to think Wikis and Second Life are a bit naff?  Wouldn&#039;t it be better to have our own names in Second Life?  Aren&#039;t avatars too cheesy for grown ups? How  long does it take to get the hang of using wikis usefully?

I know you early adopters are all excited about social media - and I am too - but I struggle to convince my colleagues in the UK public and not-for-profit sectors that it could help them. They&#039;re not even into blogs yet.  The seemingly blind enthusiasm I hear in the podosphere doesn&#039;t help.

I don&#039;t want to be negative; I want to shift things forward for my field, but I&#039;ll never be able to sell wikis and Second Life the way they are now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Lee, I love what you do on this blog, on FIR and on your Cafe podcast.  But all this social media stuff is a bit scarey to me &#8211; I am a small business owner, not a PR/marketing person.  Blogging and podcasting I get.</p>
<p>However, tonight I signed up for Second Life and visited the Cafe and Crayonville.  (Why aren&#8217;t you a Crayon, by the way?)  It was a lonely, soulless experience.  Now I have got to p11 of your white paper, and you are  raving about wikis, which I have also struggled to get much joy out of.  No doubt you will talk about Second Life later on in the paper.</p>
<p>Of all the new media podcasters/bloggers I feel I know Lee, it&#8217;s only you I dare ask: is it OK to think Wikis and Second Life are a bit naff?  Wouldn&#8217;t it be better to have our own names in Second Life?  Aren&#8217;t avatars too cheesy for grown ups? How  long does it take to get the hang of using wikis usefully?</p>
<p>I know you early adopters are all excited about social media &#8211; and I am too &#8211; but I struggle to convince my colleagues in the UK public and not-for-profit sectors that it could help them. They&#8217;re not even into blogs yet.  The seemingly blind enthusiasm I hear in the podosphere doesn&#8217;t help.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to be negative; I want to shift things forward for my field, but I&#8217;ll never be able to sell wikis and Second Life the way they are now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libby Ranzetta</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-5584</link>
		<dc:creator>Libby Ranzetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/#comment-5584</guid>
		<description>Hello Lee, I love what you do on this blog, on FIR and on your Cafe podcast.  But all this social media stuff is a bit scarey to me - I am a small business owner, not a PR/marketing person.  Blogging and podcasting I get.

However, tonight I signed up for Second Life and visited the Cafe and Crayonville.  (Why aren&#039;t you a Crayon, by the way?)  It was a lonely, soulless experience.  Now I have got to p11 of your white paper, and you are  raving about wikis, which I have also struggled to get much joy out of.  No doubt you will talk about Second Life later on in the paper.

Of all the new media podcasters/bloggers I feel I know Lee, it&#039;s only you I dare ask: is it OK to think Wikis and Second Life are a bit naff?  Wouldn&#039;t it be better to have our own names in Second Life?  Aren&#039;t avatars too cheesy for grown ups? How  long does it take to get the hang of using wikis usefully?

I know you early adopters are all excited about social media - and I am too - but I struggle to convince my colleagues in the UK public and not-for-profit sectors that it could help them. They&#039;re not even into blogs yet.  The seemingly blind enthusiasm I hear in the podosphere doesn&#039;t help.

I don&#039;t want to be negative; I want to shift things forward for my field, but I&#039;ll never be able to sell wikis and Second Life the way they are now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Lee, I love what you do on this blog, on FIR and on your Cafe podcast.  But all this social media stuff is a bit scarey to me &#8211; I am a small business owner, not a PR/marketing person.  Blogging and podcasting I get.</p>
<p>However, tonight I signed up for Second Life and visited the Cafe and Crayonville.  (Why aren&#8217;t you a Crayon, by the way?)  It was a lonely, soulless experience.  Now I have got to p11 of your white paper, and you are  raving about wikis, which I have also struggled to get much joy out of.  No doubt you will talk about Second Life later on in the paper.</p>
<p>Of all the new media podcasters/bloggers I feel I know Lee, it&#8217;s only you I dare ask: is it OK to think Wikis and Second Life are a bit naff?  Wouldn&#8217;t it be better to have our own names in Second Life?  Aren&#8217;t avatars too cheesy for grown ups? How  long does it take to get the hang of using wikis usefully?</p>
<p>I know you early adopters are all excited about social media &#8211; and I am too &#8211; but I struggle to convince my colleagues in the UK public and not-for-profit sectors that it could help them. They&#8217;re not even into blogs yet.  The seemingly blind enthusiasm I hear in the podosphere doesn&#8217;t help.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to be negative; I want to shift things forward for my field, but I&#8217;ll never be able to sell wikis and Second Life the way they are now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Hopkins: Better Communication Results - business communication, online, blog and podcast consultant</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-1439</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Hopkins: Better Communication Results - business communication, online, blog and podcast consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/#comment-1439</guid>
		<description>[...] Trevor has posted a number of the comments we have received from folks regarding our white paper &#8212; it seems that it has been positively received and we thank you for that! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Trevor has posted a number of the comments we have received from folks regarding our white paper &#8212; it seems that it has been positively received and we thank you for that! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strategic Public Relations</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-1438</link>
		<dc:creator>Strategic Public Relations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 08:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/2006/10/30/social-media-for-business-101-free-white-paper/#comment-1438</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social Media in Action&lt;/strong&gt;

Pointing to lots of good stuff today as the PR b-sphere practices what it preaches. Computers: Rohit Bhargava is working on social media projects for Intel. The most recent one is the Intel Centrino Duo Blogger Challenge. It brings six bloggers togethe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social Media in Action</strong></p>
<p>Pointing to lots of good stuff today as the PR b-sphere practices what it preaches. Computers: Rohit Bhargava is working on social media projects for Intel. The most recent one is the Intel Centrino Duo Blogger Challenge. It brings six bloggers togethe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

