1. In firefox I usually optimise as a jpg to around 86% of the original png (as for colour depth, etc., I don’t have a clue, sorry!)

2. I agree, but it it’s one more keystroke sequence (lazy or WHAT!?! {grin})

3. Didn’t realise that – will investigate the ‘customise’ feature when I get back to the office (I’m blogging away from my office at the moment)

4. No problems, but is there not a way of searching for the registered default Office dictionary if Office is intalled on the pc?

6. Syntax highlighting is a very nice nice-to-have, I agree! But as a quasi-geek I’d still prefer to have auto-closure of tags over highlighting…

Again, REALLY appreciate you joining in, Joe. If there’s anything I can do to help out (alpha/beta test upcoming versions, etc) I’m very happy to get involved!

Cheers,
Lee

1. In firefox I usually optimise as a jpg to around 86% of the original png (as for colour depth, etc., I don’t have a clue, sorry!)

2. I agree, but it it’s one more keystroke sequence (lazy or WHAT!?! {grin})

3. Didn’t realise that – will investigate the ‘customise’ feature when I get back to the office (I’m blogging away from my office at the moment)

4. No problems, but is there not a way of searching for the registered default Office dictionary if Office is intalled on the pc?

6. Syntax highlighting is a very nice nice-to-have, I agree! But as a quasi-geek I’d still prefer to have auto-closure of tags over highlighting…

Again, REALLY appreciate you joining in, Joe. If there’s anything I can do to help out (alpha/beta test upcoming versions, etc) I’m very happy to get involved!

Cheers,
Lee

1. That’s a bug. We have a number of issues in this area that we are fixing. What kind of images are you talking about (format and color depth)?

2. You could also just Ctrl+V directly into the editor. Or use the “Blog This” button in your browser (it’s included for IE, a button is available for Firefox from Windows Live Gallery) which will also blockquote your selection (if you have one).

3. You can do this yourself–the Insert Tags feature lets you fully customize the HTML that’s generated for tags by using the Customize Provider option.

4. Sorry, we haven’t gotten around to this yet. We don’t offer non-US dictionaries at all at this point.

6. We really don’t do much for you in the source editor at all–it’s not been an area of focus for us up to this point. I’d want syntax highlighting first!

1. That’s a bug. We have a number of issues in this area that we are fixing. What kind of images are you talking about (format and color depth)?

2. You could also just Ctrl+V directly into the editor. Or use the “Blog This” button in your browser (it’s included for IE, a button is available for Firefox from Windows Live Gallery) which will also blockquote your selection (if you have one).

3. You can do this yourself–the Insert Tags feature lets you fully customize the HTML that’s generated for tags by using the Customize Provider option.

4. Sorry, we haven’t gotten around to this yet. We don’t offer non-US dictionaries at all at this point.

6. We really don’t do much for you in the source editor at all–it’s not been an area of focus for us up to this point. I’d want syntax highlighting first!

>> The program ‘optimises’ any graphics it sends up to your site – despite the fact that I have already taken great care to optimise them in Fireworks.

Do you even face this problem when you upload original images without resizing them inside WLW ?

>> The program ‘optimises’ any graphics it sends up to your site – despite the fact that I have already taken great care to optimise them in Fireworks.

Do you even face this problem when you upload original images without resizing them inside WLW ?