<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ch&#8230;Ch&#8230;Ch&#8230;Ch&#8230;Changes in our Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/</link>
	<description>innovative communication for innovative communicators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:39:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reports from the Asylum &#187; Lee Hopkins&#8217; Report 02-04-2008</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2498</link>
		<dc:creator>Reports from the Asylum &#187; Lee Hopkins&#8217; Report 02-04-2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/#comment-2498</guid>
		<description>[...] the BetterComms Maserati on the  state of  social media in corporate Australia. It appears that several new initiatives are about to be unveiled within corporations rather than launching in public, thus bearing out [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the BetterComms Maserati on the  state of  social media in corporate Australia. It appears that several new initiatives are about to be unveiled within corporations rather than launching in public, thus bearing out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gillespie</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2495</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gillespie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/#comment-2495</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it is necessarily fair to say there will only be internal initiatives, I do think though it will come down to how compelling the argument is that is put forward by particular marketing folk to their stakeholders (internal or otherwise). We lag behind only as long as our arguments fail to swing the HIPPO (Highest Paid Person&#039;s Opinion).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it is necessarily fair to say there will only be internal initiatives, I do think though it will come down to how compelling the argument is that is put forward by particular marketing folk to their stakeholders (internal or otherwise). We lag behind only as long as our arguments fail to swing the HIPPO (Highest Paid Person&#8217;s Opinion).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gillespie</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-6377</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gillespie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/#comment-6377</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it is necessarily fair to say there will only be internal initiatives, I do think though it will come down to how compelling the argument is that is put forward by particular marketing folk to their stakeholders (internal or otherwise). We lag behind only as long as our arguments fail to swing the HIPPO (Highest Paid Person&#039;s Opinion).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it is necessarily fair to say there will only be internal initiatives, I do think though it will come down to how compelling the argument is that is put forward by particular marketing folk to their stakeholders (internal or otherwise). We lag behind only as long as our arguments fail to swing the HIPPO (Highest Paid Person&#8217;s Opinion).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurel Papworth</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2497</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurel Papworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/#comment-2497</guid>
		<description>I think 2008 will be the year of the NON-social media social network. Eg. social finance and social telecommunications. We&#039;ll finally get away from the focus on video and fotos and blogs. But you guys don&#039;t want to hear that :P &lt;3 ya work, see you at ad:tech, i&#039;m on a panel on day one, bring rotten fruit (I will).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think 2008 will be the year of the NON-social media social network. Eg. social finance and social telecommunications. We&#8217;ll finally get away from the focus on video and fotos and blogs. But you guys don&#8217;t want to hear that <img src='http://www.leehopkins.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  &lt;3 ya work, see you at ad:tech, i&#8217;m on a panel on day one, bring rotten fruit (I will).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurel Papworth</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-6379</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurel Papworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/#comment-6379</guid>
		<description>I think 2008 will be the year of the NON-social media social network. Eg. social finance and social telecommunications. We&#039;ll finally get away from the focus on video and fotos and blogs. But you guys don&#039;t want to hear that :P &lt;3 ya work, see you at ad:tech, i&#039;m on a panel on day one, bring rotten fruit (I will).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think 2008 will be the year of the NON-social media social network. Eg. social finance and social telecommunications. We&#8217;ll finally get away from the focus on video and fotos and blogs. But you guys don&#8217;t want to hear that <img src='http://www.leehopkins.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  &lt;3 ya work, see you at ad:tech, i&#8217;m on a panel on day one, bring rotten fruit (I will).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Noble</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2496</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Noble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/#comment-2496</guid>
		<description>Hi Lee, internal is definitely where many orgs are first implementing social media, but 2008 will be the year for action on all fronts in my view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lee, internal is definitely where many orgs are first implementing social media, but 2008 will be the year for action on all fronts in my view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Noble</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-6378</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Noble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/#comment-6378</guid>
		<description>Hi Lee, internal is definitely where many orgs are first implementing social media, but 2008 will be the year for action on all fronts in my view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lee, internal is definitely where many orgs are first implementing social media, but 2008 will be the year for action on all fronts in my view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paull Young</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2499</link>
		<dc:creator>Paull Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/#comment-2499</guid>
		<description>Hopkins, Cook and Noble on the one panel? They&#039;ve got a good representation of Australia&#039;s best.

Wish I could be there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopkins, Cook and Noble on the one panel? They&#8217;ve got a good representation of Australia&#8217;s best.</p>
<p>Wish I could be there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paull Young</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-6380</link>
		<dc:creator>Paull Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/2008/01/30/chchchchchanges-in-our-social-media/#comment-6380</guid>
		<description>Hopkins, Cook and Noble on the one panel? They&#039;ve got a good representation of Australia&#039;s best.

Wish I could be there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopkins, Cook and Noble on the one panel? They&#8217;ve got a good representation of Australia&#8217;s best.</p>
<p>Wish I could be there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

