<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Better Communication Results visitor stats &#8211; April2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/05/01/better-communication-results-visitor-stats-april2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/05/01/better-communication-results-visitor-stats-april2008/</link>
	<description>innovative communication for innovative communicators</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:39:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two heavyweights duke it out in a public blogging fued &#171; Ocker Zeal &#124; Australian Independent Online Media</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/05/01/better-communication-results-visitor-stats-april2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2721</link>
		<dc:creator>Two heavyweights duke it out in a public blogging fued &#171; Ocker Zeal &#124; Australian Independent Online Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/?p=1666#comment-2721</guid>
		<description>[...] May 1, after Lee followed up his rant by publishing his stats, and as I&#8217;m led to believe a conversation occurred between the bloggers over Facebook, Meg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] May 1, after Lee followed up his rant by publishing his stats, and as I&#8217;m led to believe a conversation occurred between the bloggers over Facebook, Meg [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Better Communication Results &#187; Ethics and the post I wasn&#8217;t going to write</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/05/01/better-communication-results-visitor-stats-april2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2720</link>
		<dc:creator>Better Communication Results &#187; Ethics and the post I wasn&#8217;t going to write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 15:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/?p=1666#comment-2720</guid>
		<description>[...] I have pointed out before, it is only ONE way of ranking websites, or blogs to be more specific, and therefore should perhaps [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have pointed out before, it is only ONE way of ranking websites, or blogs to be more specific, and therefore should perhaps [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apparently I'm involved in a Feud &#124; Dipping into the Blogpond</title>
		<link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/05/01/better-communication-results-visitor-stats-april2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2719</link>
		<dc:creator>Apparently I'm involved in a Feud &#124; Dipping into the Blogpond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 12:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leehopkins.net/?p=1666#comment-2719</guid>
		<description>[...] Lee has been a vocal opponent (see here and here) of the top 100 list, because he believes that subscriber numbers should factor into the equation , and that bloggers should disclose their subscriber numbers, and more recently their visitor statistics. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lee has been a vocal opponent (see here and here) of the top 100 list, because he believes that subscriber numbers should factor into the equation , and that bloggers should disclose their subscriber numbers, and more recently their visitor statistics. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

