http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/09/05/using-words-to-denigrate-and-isolate/ innovative communication for innovative communicators Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:39:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/09/05/using-words-to-denigrate-and-isolate/comment-page-1/#comment-2887 Jeff Anderson Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:32:34 +0000 http://leehopkins.net/2008/09/05/using-words-to-denigrate-and-isolate/#comment-2887 Your insight was beautiful. I am working on a project at the moment on poverty and the visual rhetor. This is spot on and your picture is phenomenal! PS Dagmar is a boring POS and should not be posting here Your insight was beautiful. I am working on a project at the moment on poverty and the visual rhetor. This is spot on and your picture is phenomenal! PS Dagmar is a boring POS and should not be posting here

]]> http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/09/05/using-words-to-denigrate-and-isolate/comment-page-1/#comment-6667 Jeff Anderson Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:32:00 +0000 http://leehopkins.net/2008/09/05/using-words-to-denigrate-and-isolate/#comment-6667 Your insight was beautiful. I am working on a project at the moment on poverty and the visual rhetor. This is spot on and your picture is phenomenal! PS Dagmar is a boring POS and should not be posting here Your insight was beautiful. I am working on a project at the moment on poverty and the visual rhetor. This is spot on and your picture is phenomenal! PS Dagmar is a boring POS and should not be posting here

]]> http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/09/05/using-words-to-denigrate-and-isolate/comment-page-1/#comment-2885 Lee Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:25:01 +0000 http://leehopkins.net/2008/09/05/using-words-to-denigrate-and-isolate/#comment-2885 BTW, Dagmar - I've corrected the text in the body of the article accordingly... BTW, Dagmar – I’ve corrected the text in the body of the article accordingly…

]]> http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/09/05/using-words-to-denigrate-and-isolate/comment-page-1/#comment-6665 Lee Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:25:00 +0000 http://leehopkins.net/2008/09/05/using-words-to-denigrate-and-isolate/#comment-6665 BTW, Dagmar - I've corrected the text in the body of the article accordingly... BTW, Dagmar – I’ve corrected the text in the body of the article accordingly…

]]> http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/09/05/using-words-to-denigrate-and-isolate/comment-page-1/#comment-2884 Lee Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:23:57 +0000 http://leehopkins.net/2008/09/05/using-words-to-denigrate-and-isolate/#comment-2884 Thanks, Dagmar, for the correction. Yes, it is so well integrated that it ISN'T obvious! Thanks, Dagmar, for the correction. Yes, it is so well integrated that it ISN’T obvious!

]]> http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/09/05/using-words-to-denigrate-and-isolate/comment-page-1/#comment-6664 Lee Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:23:00 +0000 http://leehopkins.net/2008/09/05/using-words-to-denigrate-and-isolate/#comment-6664 Thanks, Dagmar, for the correction. Yes, it is so well integrated that it ISN'T obvious! Thanks, Dagmar, for the correction. Yes, it is so well integrated that it ISN’T obvious!

]]> http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/09/05/using-words-to-denigrate-and-isolate/comment-page-1/#comment-2886 Dagmar Egen Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:11:57 +0000 http://leehopkins.net/2008/09/05/using-words-to-denigrate-and-isolate/#comment-2886 In response to "Even when the Government sells off great chunks of the land it owns and allows companies like Delphin to develop greenfield suburbs like Golden Grove and Mawson Lakes, no provision is made to specify a certain percentage of cheaper housing be allocated and spread throughout the whole development, so that ‘ghettos’ don’t form." This actually is incorrect. These developments definitely had a percentage set aside and scattered throughout, specifically for Housing Trust rent/buy clients. This has been on the whole quite successfull - to the point that it is not obvious. In response to “Even when the Government sells off great chunks of the land it owns and allows companies like Delphin to develop greenfield suburbs like Golden Grove and Mawson Lakes, no provision is made to specify a certain percentage of cheaper housing be allocated and spread throughout the whole development, so that ‘ghettos’ don’t form.”
This actually is incorrect. These developments definitely had a percentage set aside and scattered throughout, specifically for Housing Trust rent/buy clients. This has been on the whole quite successfull – to the point that it is not obvious.

]]> http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/09/05/using-words-to-denigrate-and-isolate/comment-page-1/#comment-6666 Dagmar Egen Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:11:00 +0000 http://leehopkins.net/2008/09/05/using-words-to-denigrate-and-isolate/#comment-6666 In response to "Even when the Government sells off great chunks of the land it owns and allows companies like Delphin to develop greenfield suburbs like Golden Grove and Mawson Lakes, no provision is made to specify a certain percentage of cheaper housing be allocated and spread throughout the whole development, so that ‘ghettos’ don’t form." This actually is incorrect. These developments definitely had a percentage set aside and scattered throughout, specifically for Housing Trust rent/buy clients. This has been on the whole quite successfull - to the point that it is not obvious. In response to “Even when the Government sells off great chunks of the land it owns and allows companies like Delphin to develop greenfield suburbs like Golden Grove and Mawson Lakes, no provision is made to specify a certain percentage of cheaper housing be allocated and spread throughout the whole development, so that ‘ghettos’ don’t form.”
This actually is incorrect. These developments definitely had a percentage set aside and scattered throughout, specifically for Housing Trust rent/buy clients. This has been on the whole quite successfull – to the point that it is not obvious.

]]>